If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose?
Taking global warming into close consideration as one of the crucial issues in anyone's life it is included that some scientists believe that individuals should act positively to overcome this matter; however, others consider it as a governmental responsibility. This essay will discuss the role of not only government but also individuals. More explanation will be put forward.
There are several convincing reasons, why governments are responsible for prohibiting global warming. To explain more, governments by imposing low can prevent environmental damage, deforestation, dying lakes, air pollution. The researchers of Sydney university conducted research on corporates role in climate change in 2015, and they found that 50 percent of factories are producing less CO emission by monitoring government.
In addition, climate change is correlated with individual’s actions. For example, people are required to use hydraulic cars or public transport to stop burning more fossil fuels. Finally, it is argued that individuals play a vital role in preventing climate change.
To conclude, although preventing climate change is assumed to be an individual task, it is argued that government is also responsible in this matter, and more investigation to solve this problem is required.
- what is the effect of work environment on employees? 88
- Positive and negative effects of the information revolution through mass media 44
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 11
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 11
- Should voting be compulsory for all citizens or people should have freedom to choose not to vote. What is your opinion 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, so, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1102.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 192.0 242.827586207 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73958333333 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.92707691288 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27971194111 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692708333333 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.9797028531 50.4703680194 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.2 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.25397266985 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0596230196188 0.242375264174 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0282659116444 0.0925447433944 31% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283979788728 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0369234503956 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0184790155173 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 200 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.