importance of tourism
The importance of tourism in underdeveloped countries which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. However, the substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. So, this essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To embark with, there are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but then most preponderant one stems from the fact that when foreign people travel to underdeveloped countries and the economic growth are increasing of that country. Furthermore, another pivotal aspect of this argument is that the tourism travelling increasing day by day. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
On the other hand, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that tourists are promoting western culture and eventually they diminishing their original culture. For example, when foreign people come in underdeveloped countries they litter rubbish all around. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
To be conclude, according to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of in developed countries, tourism has advantages and disadvantages and can be said opposite as well are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2021-02-02 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 55 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 77 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45210727969 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95103734704 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605363984674 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 439.2 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.6394802204 50.4703680194 154% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.583333333 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.25397266985 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.105183432741 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.034689230169 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669384315309 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0589405872099 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040517342416 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.