With the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers, fewer people are writing letters. Some people think that the traditional skill of writing letters will disappear completely. To what extent do you agree or disagree? How important do you think is letter-writing?
Recently, declining of writing skills regarding to increasing use of mobile phones has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of increasing use of mobile phones?". Whereas it is a widely held view that it is not beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the information technology standpoint, modern telecommunication is bound up inextricably with internet network, which indicates it leads to both computer and smart phone. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between easy access and social network as well as an exponential increase in internet users. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of computer skills is correlated positively with not only E-mail but also Facebook.
Within the realm of sociopsychological, without the slightest doubt, traditional methods attribute to letters, in that it would come down to stress, long distance, and taking time. A salient example of such attribution is post office, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take simultaneous message for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint old-fashioned communication problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to less concentration, anxiety, and even depression. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of parents, schools, and mass media.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of increasing use of mobile phone outweigh its disadvantages. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-26 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-26 | MehdiKhodadadi | 85 | view |
- what roles should governments, companies, and individuals play to combat climate change? 88
- People usually mix their private and professional life. What are the pros and cons of this? 77
- With the increase in the use of mobile phones and computers, fewer people are writing letters. Some people think that the traditional skill of writing letters will disappear completely. To what extent do you agree or disagree? How important do you think i 85
- There are social, medical and technical problems associated with the use of mobile phones. What forms do they take? Do you agree that the problems outweigh the benefits of mobile phones? 85
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? What are the reasons for that? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the information technology standpoi...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not only E-mail but also Facebook. Within the realm of sociopsychological, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... parents, schools, and mass media. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, regarding, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.76450511945 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3352865792 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 139.433497537 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686006825939 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.8326959839 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.923076923 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.38461538462 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132169722153 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0341007475394 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507686079893 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788192186876 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0597128360986 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.6 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.