The Influence of Mass Media on Teenagers. Share your views?
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding the impact of the mass media such as television and radio on the youth and teenagers. I firmly concur with the opinion that mass media play a prominent role on the youngsters. Two effects contribute significantly to this, which are reducing the physical activities and disturb them from their study.
The first noteworthy is mass media alleviates the exercises on sports and physical activities. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further games and computers and enjoyable times. Subsequently, final results revealed that there is a highly complex relationship between spending times on the internet and reducing the practices even though fewer sports should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between youngsters exercises and the internet and mass media.
Furthermore, mass media has a negative impact on the teenagers and distract them from their studies. For instance, a quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne university concerning books and their homework. Hence, perhaps if scientific research is significantly correlated with lower grades and scores, the preliminary findings will be closely associated with television watching as well as listening to the radio.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that mass media has a negative impact on the teenagers and reduce the physical activities and prevent them from the study. Moreover, not only should national institutions endeavour to discern, but also they should be cognizant of controlling the children of watching television.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, for instance, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61509433962 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0640858809 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611320754717 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0415609136 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160951090763 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0664259210129 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069388419011 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0993024478366 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0462838623585 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.57 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.