Family should have only one car and use an alternative vehicle
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding the pollution and increasing the number of vehicles in the street. I firmly concur with the opinion that there should be a vehicle per family, and other members of the family employ the public transportation because of the pollution and problems.
To begin with, myriad vehicle engenders pollution, and family can share one car. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further the risk of health problems and gas and pollution in big cities and its significant impact on people. Final results revealed that there is a fairly clear relationship between employing the bus and train and tram and personal cars even though reducing the time and energy and cost and heart problems and air pollution should be taken into consideration.Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between utilising more than one car and the disease and air pollution.
Furthermore, using more than one car per family leads to the making problems for cities and themselves and other residents. For instance, a quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne University concerning the traffic jam, the wasting time and money. Hence, if the scientific research is significantly correlated with using the tram and fewer accidents and injuries and death, the preliminary findings will be closely related to both further issues and other issues.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to the opinion that each family must use one car and have a journey with the public transportation due to the significant issues and pollution. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to alleviate the number of cars in big cities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 544, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...tion should be taken into consideration.Thus, people can be fully informed about suf...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 8.36945812808 311% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1559.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30272108844 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98041682425 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58843537415 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.2010216283 50.4703680194 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 155.9 104.977214359 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4 20.9669160288 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317219938402 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115319657298 0.0925447433944 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0800086786803 0.071462118173 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177457013676 0.151781067708 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0708963079339 0.0609392437508 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.