TELEVISION SHOWS AND ITS IMPACT ON SOCIETY
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding watching television and its impact on the society. I firmly concur with the opinion that television has a positive and negative impact on the peoples' lives. Its negative impact is on the peoples' health, and its affirmative influence is receiving news and information.
To begin with, the negative effect of the television is on the health. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further physical activities and sports and exercises. Subsequently, final results revealed that there is a highly complex relationship between heart disease and reducing the practices even though the hours of watching television should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between the person's health and the amount of spending on media.
However, the positive influence of the television is acquiring the information and news from all over the world. For instance, quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne University concerning the newspapers and media and obtaining data. Hence, perhaps if the scientific research is significantly correlated with news and books and internet and programmes and channels, the preliminary findings will be closely associated with obtaining the information in a second.
To conclude, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that spending time on the television and seeing it has a negative and positive impact on the individuals such as body's health and receiving information. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to teach the people in regard to the television and media.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 252, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...es lives. Its negative impact is on the peoples health, and its affirmative influence i...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 529, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...t evidence of a causal link between the persons health and the amount of spending on me...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, so, thus, for instance, such as, in regard to, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 8.36945812808 239% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55311355311 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07654803226 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578754578755 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1179843732 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.333333333 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0 7.25397266985 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214432469028 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885341868493 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878611876973 0.071462118173 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138925295743 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123549989923 0.0609392437508 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.21 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.88 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.