Information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some negative effects on individual lives as well on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, mass communication has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether information revolution has changed the way of mass communication or not?”. It is a widely held view that modern technology in the field of information is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up carefully the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that mass communication plays a vital role in the information revolution. To put into consideration, I express several reasons why I support this idea. First and foremost is that people are able to make a video connection from one country to another as well the business conference can be used by the Internet in scientific fields. Secondly, it can be argued that surgeons can operate surgery remotely without having a physical presence in hospitals. In addition to this information, a group of scientists, working at a prestigious university conducted they will be able to travel other planets and interact with other exotic organisms. Also, booking the ticket can be carried out online and traveling has been significantly convenient.
However, information revolution in mass media provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that some technological devices, such as the Internet have made the communities more sedentary and people are introvert that the past. Moreover, new communication has made numerous crime, including, cybercrime, abusing juveniles, and hackers are able to access information illegally.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that mass communication in the field of information must be taken into consideration to promote people’s lifestyle. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 41, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...Nowadays, mass communication has become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, in addition, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.75862068966 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48160535117 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22587690542 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.6957032607 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.076923077 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.69230769231 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18495578952 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610343750633 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641872567064 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116088127549 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440193733525 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.8 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.