Information revolution has changed the way of mass communication and had some positive and negative effects on individuals lives as well as society. To what extent you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the role of mass communication has attracted many controversies and drawn attention from the public. Some people agree that this information revolution has changed the lives of people, while on the other hand, stands a perspective that there are some negatives consequences on the society. Perhaps, I believe that the advent of mass media has brought people closer to each other. This essay will further elaborate on both the sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various ways in which the mass media proves beneficial for society. The most conspicuous one is that the various forms of mass media provide the latest updates of the happenings around the globe. Moreover, it makes people well-informed about the international and domestic news that helps in their decision-making. Hence, in this way, mass communication helps in brain-storming and eventually broadens their horizon about the latest information.
Nevertheless, there are arguments which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of information revolution. The most alarming one is that it displays the harsh realities of society in forms of violence, riots, crimes and terrorist activities. Furthermore, these activities influence the people negatively especially children and youngsters. For instance, some younger ones watch sitcoms or follow the trends on TV which are unacceptable and anti-social. Thus, there is no doubt that mass communication has some adverse effects on its people.
In view of the arguments outlined above, the impact of mass media is prominent in society as it keeps people abreast of the latest news, however, there are some drawbacks that can be well-handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, however, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, well, while, for instance, no doubt, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1449.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4679245283 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05975611962 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 442.8 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6024288566 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.5 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9285714286 20.9669160288 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248271857977 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767300151624 0.0925447433944 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753976591571 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135101547464 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483998545333 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.