Imitating celebrities in sports or movies is good or bad ?
Nowadays, the role sports stars and movie celebrities serve in society is highly controversial and has drawn attention from the public. While many people claim that they are a role model for children, on the other hand, stands a perspective that these personalities wear an unsocial attitude and follow an indifferent life. However, I believe that the exposure of their lives can immensely help our future generations. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and will thus, give a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are many reasons why sports or movie celebrities serve as a role model for children and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that these people are an epitome of sincerity, perseverance and dedication towards their goals. Moreover, the hardwork they do show their never say die attitude and enthusiasm. For example, many children follow Sachin Tendulkar as their hero and look up to his honesty and loyalty towards cricket. Thus, by instilling these qualities, children stay focused and determined towards their career.
In contrast, there are some drawbacks which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of these celebrities on younger ones. The most alarming one is that sometimes these celebrities engage in antisocial and unacceptable activities which hamper the societal values. For instance, often we have seen sports stars resort to drugs to boost their performance which can negatively affect children who follow them religiously. Moreover, these glamorous people live in an artificial world and get easily triggered by loneliness, depression and dejection in their later lives. Hence, it is apparent why imitating these personalities can bring serious damage to our future talent.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the impact of sports stars and movie celebrities is prominent on younger ones and the positives of imitating these personalities far outweigh their downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-22 | Nina Tsarevich | 78 | view |
| 2021-05-08 | rejeesh | 49 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | Kanika Aggarwal | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | gobindh Singh | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Sinabri | 80 | view |
- Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression for the company. To what extent do you agree or disgree? 85
- The environment we are living is in danger due to various problems. What are the underlying causes? Who do you think is responsible for this ? Is it governments, organization or each individual? What measures? 80
- “ War is inevitable outcome of life ”.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/ or examples from your own experience, observation or reading. 55
- Any recent invention that you think has proved detrimental or beneficial to society? 11
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this. 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, look, moreover, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 306.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42483660131 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8231889773 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581699346405 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7008779203 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.571428571 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8571428571 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156995191556 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554074376925 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0725274614183 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116447554824 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547356088971 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.