The issue of overcrowding is addressed by city planners, not the policy-making population. What is your opinion about this statement?
Recently, the phenomenon of "the issue of overcrowding is addressed by city planners, not the policy-making population" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that overcrowding in cities might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the role of city planners can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the urbanization standpoint, addressing the issue of overcrowding by city planners can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that developing standard cities and using architectural plans are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the effects of urban population on modern societies. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both migrating from rural areas to urban areas and living in small houses distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of climate science, without the slightest doubt, addressing the issue of overcrowding by the policy-making population might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the air pollution in big cities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of overcrowding can relate to the reality that the demerits of population distribution can pertain to the lack of adequate land in cities. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of urbanization were correlated positively with environment preservation, the local authorities would ultimately address reducing greenhouse gas emission. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of policy-making issues.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of addressing the issue of overcrowding by city planners far outweigh its downsides.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-25 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation Do you agree or disagree 80
- If Voting is compulsory in democratic society what conclusions can we draw about Nature of democracy 88
- What are the advantages of cheaper public transportation What will cause us to achieve it 88
- Some people see prisons as the place where criminals should be punished while some people think their primary function should be to teach them how to lead better lives What is your opinion about the main function of time spent in prison punishment or reha 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86333333333 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44004360437 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606666666667 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 379.143842365 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.669627608 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.909090909 104.977214359 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.54545454545 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323053112479 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113919308388 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0767896104563 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19086665113 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0553688567355 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 53.1260098522 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.