Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns In your own experience is it a positive development

One of the most important trends of today's world is the sudden upsurge in the statement that "Large shopping malls". There is a widespread worry that this will lead to a myriad of concerns in the world. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of the above statement which relates to "large shopping malls are replacing small local shops" using a pragmatic approach.

To commence with, there are arguments in favour of my stance. The most important one not only includes betterment of the society but also includes the positive development of every individual on the planet. Because of the countless benefits, not only can one gain more when it comes to being successful and effective, but they can also improve their efficiency, productivity, and quality of life with a great deal of efficacy and convenience.

Another crucial factor in the aforementioned statement is that it is only likely to assist one to flourish, progress, and excel in a variety of fields and disciplines. Consequently, only when an individual adheres to such a system, they can expand their horizons, skills and acquire qualities such as commitment, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it is evident why many are in favour of "large shopping malls are replacing small local shops".

Lastly, in my opinion, the government of Australia is taking a great initiative in educating its citizens against the negative impacts of the statement that "Large shopping malls". Citizens are being encouraged to follow the applicable laws as well as rules and regulations to promote prosperity, productivity, efficiency, and a positive environment in the world.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, lastly, so, well, such as, as well as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4144486692 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17381416111 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536121673004 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 456.3 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9639773137 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.454545455 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244899739345 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0930706807345 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121792027922 0.071462118173 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144211065024 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077539329648 0.0609392437508 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.