Large shopping malls are replacing small local shops in cities and towns. In your own experience, is it a positive development?
The importance of small shopping malls, which frequently generated a great deal of heated debate, has recently become even more controversial. Some proponents claimed it is positive that large shopping malls are replacing small local stores, while others believe these local stores are still important to local communities. This essays will elaborate on how large shopping malls are beneficial and how local stores are still necessary.
At the outset, there are various reasons why some people believe that the replacement of large shopping malls to small local stores is a positive trend but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that these malls have stimulated buying and selling activities that lead to accelerating the development of countries' economy. Particularly, it provides a competitive market where customers can find a good price for their wish list and sellers can promote their best products. Besides, these provide numerous choices from commodities to luxurious things that consumers can buy in this open market. Thus, the role of central markets like this is indispensable for the improvement of the economic value.
Moving on to consider the opposing argument put forward by critics, some opponents claim that small local stores are essential for a majority of people. In fact, most people do not want to go to huge shopping malls frequently because they are often located far away from residential areas. For example, if you have to buy eggs, flour or some ingredients for your urgent needs, you will most likely go to the closest grocery stores instead of driving to a mall. Due to its convenience, local stores are unable to be replaced, even with the rising of large shopping malls.
In conclusion, taking these points into consideration, from my personal perspective, I am inclined to believe that small local shops are still useful for many people and they should exist due to very high demand.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61325467569 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7085293694 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.25 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320373573696 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11767138188 0.0925447433944 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981317174327 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198866712848 0.151781067708 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871654294385 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.