Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change?
The effect of large shopping malls replacing small shopping malls, which has always been debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of the dominating status of leading retailers has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on our society in recent years. It can be agreed that these big shopping malls play a vital role, though the importance of small shops cannot be ignored. This essay will elaborate how Large retailers could contribute to the price transparency and how small malls can also contribute to people’s wellbeing, and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why larger shopping malls should replace or purchase small malls, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that leading retailing moguls could set a benchmark of the merchandises’ prices which makes the price more transparent for customers. As an illustration, research has invariably revealed that the price of a specific merchandise is much more divergent among different regions 10 years ago compared with today. Furthermore, the fierce competition among big shopping malls could finally benefit consumers through a form of price war. Therefore, leading retailers’ domination in beneficial for consumers in terms of price.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that the convenience that small shops brought is also significant as there are innumerable reasons for that but the most salient one is that small malls are always located in rural or remote areas where big malls have not been pervasive. For instance, people live in rural areas 30 miles away from the city could easily purchase the fresh fruits without driving cars with the existence of small shops. Thus, people’s living habit must change negatively if all small shops vanished.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of replacing small shops with large malls is prominent, although the approachability of small shops should not be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-11 | ardalan1984 | 85 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | gupta-vikas | 55 | view |
| 2019-12-16 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-28 | D_M | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | 6tttcj | 80 | view |
- Some point that experiential learning ( ie. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others thinks a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning can work well in high schools or colleges? 85
- Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change? 55
- Some universities deduct students work if assignment is given late What is your opinion and suggest some alternative actions 48
- Some people argue that experience is the best teacher. Life experiences can teach more effectively than books or formal school education. How far do you agree with this idea? Support your opinion with reasons/ or your personal experience. 80
- With the increases of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, furthermore, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1745.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 326.0 242.827586207 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3527607362 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91734563716 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 139.433497537 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570552147239 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.7648610187 50.4703680194 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.416666667 104.977214359 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1666666667 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245363275461 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936482824591 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0633824238543 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161725979784 0.151781067708 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655217546889 0.0609392437508 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 55.0591133005 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.