Recently, individuals’ behavior and law have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?” whereas it is a widely held view that human behavior governed by legislation is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the sociology standpoint, the rule of law and developments are bound up inextricably with governments policies, which indicates they lead to both progress lifestyle and state-of-the-art technologies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between globalization and crime commitment crisis as well as an exponential increase in social achievements. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far support the contention that the likelihood of occurring strict law is correlated positively with not only irreversible changes.
Within the realm of juridical science, without the slightest doubt, efficient legislative systems attribute to alternative hypotheses, in that it would come down governmental interventions, criminal behaviors, and international legal institutions. A salient example of such attribution is non-governmental organizations, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to being a threat to the society. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint international law problems. Likewise, hardly had they confine their attention to punishment, jail, and even jury. Hence, it is reasonable that infer the pivotal role of systematic changes.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well” after analyzing what elaborated above, I highly agree that severe legislation effects on behavior are of high importance. However, we perceive that with the benefit of hindsight, the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 375, Rule ID: IT_IS_JJ_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'be'?
Suggestion: be
...se for concern since it was mistaken to being a threat to the society. Had there been...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1710.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 286.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.97902097902 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.57502735347 2.71678728327 132% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 139.433497537 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.2416489251 50.4703680194 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.5 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8333333333 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103981263172 0.242375264174 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0267187236105 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377236961469 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.060531201281 0.151781067708 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392770404026 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 12.6369458128 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.7 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.29 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 55.0591133005 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 22.5 9.94827586207 226% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.