The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn and relearn. Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of Illiteracy in the 21st century and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that reading and writing are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that learning can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, the relearning system can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that school, as well as the university, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered mastering the fundamental. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both knowledge and education degree can be seen.
Within the realm of the rapid growth of technology, reluctant to unlearn might increase the consequences of unlearning. Moreover, fundamental aspects of existing theory relate to this reality that the demerits of relearning pertain to innovations. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of analphabetic is correlated negatively with culture. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of unlettered.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly Believe that the benefits of relearning far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of study prove the significance of reading and writing, but also pinpoint illiteracy implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1361.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64730290456 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.31544357709 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659751037344 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3805504983 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.416666667 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109224741089 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0330203336106 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277604333696 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0581360881827 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413440543188 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 12.6369458128 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.