Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Do you agree or disagree? Give examples from your experience.
Recently, the phenomenon of learning a new language at an early age and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of children's future aspects are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that agreeing to learn other languages can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, learning a new language can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of cognitive impacts, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of astute children. Thus, beneficial ramifications of brilliant facets are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, learning other languages can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of useless skills are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described time-consuming activities. Hence, predicted outcomes of exhausted children are critical.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of learning a new language at an early age far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of atrocious influences prove the significance of energetic children, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-11 | Alireza.r.m | 88 | view |
| 2020-03-06 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
| 2017-12-03 | Amir NIkzad | 90 | view |
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 88
- It is often argued that studying overseas is overrated There are many scholars who study locally To what extend do you agree that this can effect a quality education 85
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals 49
- Tourism is good for some less developed countries but also has some disadvantages Discuss 88
- Increasing the price of fuels is the best way to solve pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61538461538 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21628826299 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649572649573 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.758517911 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.454545455 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266242779168 0.242375264174 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843160914567 0.0925447433944 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535721446361 0.071462118173 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147481006092 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516907271174 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.89 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.