Should individual limit the use of car and use alternative things instead to protect environment?
Recently, the phenomenon of using cars individually and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of alternative means are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that protecting the environment can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, limiting the use of cars can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of cost-effective ways, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of the protected environment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of hybrid cars are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, using a car individually can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of pollutant factors are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described the less-protected environment. Hence, predicted outcomes of diesel cars are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of limiting the use of cars far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of protecting the environment prove the significance of a sustainable method, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-02-22 | Alireza.r.m | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-04 | Gohar Khan | 55 | view |
| 2019-04-09 | Jigerdeep singh | 85 | view |
| 2019-04-05 | titanic-basnet | 43 | view |
- It is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature To what extent you agree Give example 11
- Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them Give your opinion and discuss your views 77
- Increasing the price of fuels is the best way to solve pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 80
- Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 88
- Increasing the price of fuels is the best way to solve pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64628820961 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38242800461 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633187772926 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4239200505 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.545454545 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311303209907 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958946389651 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549060025055 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173251774482 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188918105199 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.