Should individual limit the use of car and use alternative things instead to protect environment?
Recently, the phenomenon of using cars individually and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of alternative means are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that protecting the environment can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, limiting the use of cars can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as the advantages of cost-effective ways, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of the protected environment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of hybrid cars are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, using a car individually can supply the community with negative impacts, which are associated with the reality that the demerits of pollutant factors are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described the less-protected environment. Hence, predicted outcomes of diesel cars are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of limiting the use of cars far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of protecting the environment prove the significance of a sustainable method, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64628820961 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.38242800461 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633187772926 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 419.4 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4239200505 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.545454545 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8181818182 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311303209907 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958946389651 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549060025055 0.071462118173 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173251774482 0.151781067708 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0188918105199 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 55.0591133005 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.