In less developed countries, are the disadvantages of tourism as great as the advantages?
Nowadays, it is increasingly acknowledged that the effects of tourism are one of the biggest issues which less developed countries are facing. While some people believe that these effects are advantages, others would argue that there still have some disadvantaged parts. As far as I am concerned, the impacts of tourism are both advantages and disadvantages, which can be supported by the reasons as follows.
It is reasonable for me to believe that there has an advantaged influence from tourism in less developed countries, which is obvious because the booming tourism industry will bring many tourists thus boost the local economy. To further support the above statement, India started to develop its local tourism in 2000, which has dramatically increased the gross domestic product over the decades.
On the other hand, it also has some disadvantaged effects. The main justification for this view is that tourism will bring environmental issues. In particular, those less developed countries usually do not have sufficient waste disposal systems and lack funds to deal with a large amount of waste brought about by the tourists. Besides, some tourists may break the ecological balance and cause permanent damage to the environment. This can be established by a recent study by Oxford University which stated that 76% of the viewpoint had been polluted because of too many tourists.
In a nutshell, although this controversial topic never fails to attract public attention, we may safely conclude that there are both advantages and disadvantages of tourism in less developed countries.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, if, may, so, still, thus, while, in particular, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1354.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39442231076 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92731371206 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609561752988 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4055825425 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.090909091 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8181818182 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354645759858 0.242375264174 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121183943448 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108609460677 0.071462118173 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235333237228 0.151781067708 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0919708347523 0.0609392437508 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.