Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy; some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree, what are the advantages or disadvantages associated with this.

Recently, the impact of employees' participation in decision making plans has sparked an ongoing controversy. While some people believe it leads to positive results, others maintain that it is not to the benefit of the company. This essay will discuss why employees can exert a positive influence when being involved in decision making policy.

To begin with, when employees are involved in making decisions, they gain a professional and personal stake in the organization and its overall success. This commitment leads to increased productivity, job satisfaction, as well as loyalty as employees are actively engaging in various aspects of the company, their opinions are voiced, and the gap between managers and employees is lowered. Overall, such positives increase company's accomplishments. By contrast, those companies who resist against employees' participation in strategic decision making would be unable to win glorious prospects.

On the other hand, using employees in the decision-making process, rather than outsourcing, saves money and time along with offering long-term reliable assistance from those who know the corporation well. Hiring an outside consulting firm is expensive besides taking up valuable resources in fees and the time spent updating outside consultants in various aspects of the company. However, employees are already aware of these processes, offer insightful knowledge of the company needs, and understand the policies of the company overall.

In conclusion, I completely agree that actively engaging employees in the decision-making process boosts company's success due to increasing company's production, thanks to employees' positive attitudes towards the company, and saving consultation budget.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ompany, and saving consultation budget.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, so, well, while, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89328063241 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0912932042 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.644268774704 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3508717932 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.545454545 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245075139136 0.242375264174 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944218516889 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427676566255 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159592133875 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384433004739 0.0609392437508 63% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 12.6369458128 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.