Recently, the phenomenon of the pivotal role fo mass media and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the number of television channels is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that working as a pivot shape the society can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social media standpoint, commercial advertisements can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that magazine, as well as newspaper, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered advertisement. Thus, beneficial ramifications of an effective communication and an email message apparently can be seen.
Within the realm a media campaign, social networks might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of Internet broadcasting. Moreover, fundamental aspects of information revolution relate to this reality that demerits of computer software pertain to articles. As a tangible example, a scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of periodicals is correlated negatively with the journals. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the digital ages.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the propaganda far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of computer networks prove the significance of bloggers, but also pinpoint a local radio station implication.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6862745098 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34876703828 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.670588235294 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4031450436 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101733436203 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0311377765973 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0433452638715 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0529383169798 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418614654133 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 11.5310837438 136% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.3 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.