People pursue dangerous activities like skydiving, motorcycle sports, whitewater river rafting etc. Do you support? If yes, why and if not, why?
Recently, the phenomenon of dangerous activities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that extreme sports are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a
substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that risky sports can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the sports standpoint, the activity can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that health, as well as financial, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered boosting adrenaline. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both physical and mental apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of psychology, blood pressure might increase the consequences of N. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the physical relationship to this reality that the demerits of skydiving pertain to rafting. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of risky is correlated negatively with harmful sports. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of unsafe.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of extreme activities far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of mental prove the significance of body, but also pinpoint physical implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...that throughout this essay. From the sports standpoint, the activity can provide th...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 199, Rule ID: PROVE_PROOF[2]
Message: Did you mean 'proof' (noun) instead of prove (verb)?
Suggestion: proof
...s. Not only do the advantages of mental prove the significance of body, but also pinp...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1295.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.63043478261 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23438812461 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665217391304 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.106940167 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.916666667 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1666666667 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0496059039915 0.242375264174 20% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0160778949751 0.0925447433944 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0225084253204 0.071462118173 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0250461705309 0.151781067708 17% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0180412045489 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.37 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.76 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.