In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not?
Recently, test-taking strategies/ undertaking a systematic assessment have/has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that a comprehensive evaluation is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational institute standpoint, traditional assessments/objective evaluations are bound up inextricably with proper evaluations/ adequate assessments, which indicates they lead to both remarkable and considerable achievement. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between a systematic method and a systematic approach as well as an exponential increase in educational achievement. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of examination results is correlated positively with not only systematic analysis but also overall assessments.
Within the realm of evaluation procedures, without the slightest doubt, final assessments attribute to assessment criterion, in that it would come down to optimistic assessments, selection processes, and examination candidates. A salient example of such attribution is examination marks, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take technical achievement for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint balanced assessments problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to continuous assessments, a wide range of questions, and even practical assignments. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of passing competitive written examinations.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that accurate assessment process must be taken into consideration. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1207.87684729 152% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 6.2619047619 5.00649968141 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.64659005752 2.71678728327 134% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.700680272109 0.580463131201 121% => OK
syllable_count: 576.9 379.143842365 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.57093596059 127% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7119317465 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.615384615 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6153846154 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0844729522356 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0276097742666 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0324131789289 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.043943283635 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024264572641 0.0609392437508 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.31 53.1260098522 29% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 19.32 11.5310837438 168% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.39 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 55.0591133005 225% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.94827586207 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 10.5123152709 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.