The means of communicating in society today has changed markedly over the last ten years. In your opinion, what are the positive and negative impacts of this change?
Of late there has been a colossal upsurge among the proigies discussing the impact of communication sources in society. Some people think that advacement and introduction of communication sources has numerous negative effects on society, while others maintain that rapid development in the domain of communication has resulted in ease and comfort of human society. This essay will discuss the positivities of advacement in communication.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the advantages of development of communication medias. Firstly, the most conspicuous is the connection among distant located people. The evolution of communication media has not only be brought people closer but also made each other accessible in the hour of need. For example, by the use of mobile phone loved one's can be reached and contacted to share and grief or happiness. As a result, it is quite evident that rapid development in communication arena has brought humans more closer to each other.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is the introduction of video calling by new communication technology. Previously, owing to busy routine, it was almost impossible or very difficult to meet our loved one's living at distant countries. Thus, with the advent of video calling apps, for example, skype, facebook and whatsapp people can physically see their beloved relatives and at times using these apps, give them a live coverage of various family functions. As a matter of fact, the visual connection eastablished between people is one of the biggest advantges of advacement in communication medias.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that owing to close and visual connectivity among people across the globe offered by evolution in communication medias, advantages triumph over disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | bellawuyun | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | richierich25 | 11 | view |
| 2019-03-22 | milad21rz | 88 | view |
| 2018-09-05 | Anonymous | 80 | view |
| 2018-07-18 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
- The claim that animals have "rights" has been subject to much of a debate since 1970. Are zoos helping or hurting animals? Should zoos be banned? Do you agree or disagree? 61
- Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer. 89
- some people believe that it is good to do multiple jobs,while others believe that it is better to focus on one job?Do you agree or disagree?I 67
- Claim An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discuss the exte 50
- Whether studying films at school is as important as studying literature? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 538, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'closer' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: closer
... communication arena has brought humans more closer to each other. On the other hand, a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...ble or very difficult to meet our loved ones living at distant countries. Thus, with...
^^^^
Line 7, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by evolution in communication medias, advantages triumph over disadvantages. ...
^^
Line 7, column 180, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ion in communication medias, advantages triumph over disadvantages.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, thus, while, for example, as a matter of fact, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 31.9359605911 153% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 5.75862068966 399% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50877192982 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13493799896 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4281080633 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.769230769 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.61538461538 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968192107963 0.242375264174 40% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0375482260146 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0308078657554 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0618237289764 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322639754259 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 11.5310837438 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.