Media make people lose contact with real life, do you agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of "media make people lose contact with real life" and its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debating the proposition that contacts in real life might be remarkably fruitful, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a remarkable number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that media can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the society standpoint, the importance of media in real life can provide the society with profound effects, which might stem from the fact that increasing the awareness of people and the presence of media are inextricably bound up. Regarding my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the types of media. Thus, invaluable ramifications of both the traditional media and the online media distinctly can be observed.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, losing contact with real life by media might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of mental ills. Moreover, fundamental aspects of relationships in the real life can relate to the reality that the demerits of the absence of contacts can pertain to the virtual world. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that if the downsides of losing contacts with friends were correlated positively with establishing new friend networks, the local authorities would ultimately address the self-esteem of individuals. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the preconceived notion of enjoying the real life.
To conclude, despite several compelling arguments on both sides, I opt to vigorously support the idea that the merits of media in real life far outweigh its downsides.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 128, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...nd its corresponding impact has sparked a long-running dispute. Whereas many people are debati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1564.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52650176678 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13798029012 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597173144876 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 491.4 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4450436825 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.181818182 104.977214359 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7272727273 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.45454545455 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386186440993 0.242375264174 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140334442762 0.0925447433944 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0864009457153 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.219640919763 0.151781067708 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769093596362 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.