Medical technology helps to live long life. Is this blessing for society and mankind?
Surely there has been no time in the history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A typical day reveals the advancement of bio technology in science has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussions. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain how medical technology helps to live long life.
To begin with, Bio technology is getting more advances with the passage of time. This branch of science has made everything possible, for example any internal body part transplant or changing the genders are the big success of this medical technology. Doctors have controlled many deadly diseases like cancer. In old times there is no medicine for cancer but now everything is changed. The most recent big success of bio technology increases the life expectancy of humans. This long life formula is discovered in Antarctica by French doctor.
On the contrary, if the life expectancy of humans increases then there will be a big loss to the world. Death rate will decrease and this will increase the population. Unemployment rate become high and this will give loss to job opportunities.
In conclusion, I would say this technology is blessing for mankind. Also there are many disadvantages of science and technology but everything is dependent on humans we should use this technology in limits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 69, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...his technology is blessing for mankind. Also there are many disadvantages of science...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for example, in conclusion, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1126.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11818181818 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86239511338 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.1085531233 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.4285714286 104.977214359 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366750194757 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115040214687 0.0925447433944 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106635578168 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197726422644 0.151781067708 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0808866083669 0.0609392437508 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.