Medical technology helps to live a long life. Is that curse or blessing for society and mankind?
Recently, the phenomenon of medical technology and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of social satisfaction is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that a healthy environment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, living long life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of equipped hospitals, as well as treatment methods, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a blessing for mankind and technological improvement. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both new medicines and modern medical facilities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, traditional medical devices might increase the consequences of useless medical devices. Moreover, fundamental aspects of well-educated doctors might relate to this reality that the demerits of an unhealthy diet pertain to harmful antibiotics. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of useless pills is correlated negatively with side effects. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of medical accessories invention.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of life expectancy far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of modern clinics prove the significance of a hopeful life, but also pinpoint curing methods implications.
- Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. 85
- It is important for children to study cultural courses like film/movie/video gaming at school to learn literature. To what extent you agree? Give example. 85
- With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area? 80
- Governments and international organizations are facing global problems. Provide solutions. 88
- Soon retirement of workers can create job opportunities for young people. discuss 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 511, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'accessories'' or 'accessory's'?
Suggestion: accessories'; accessory's
...sume the preconceived notion of medical accessories invention. To conclude, while there ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70114942529 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27475278658 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674329501916 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.3647516174 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207564417166 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0569861114703 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054394854107 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100980866429 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783767667222 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.