Medical technology is responsible for an increase in human’s life expectancy. Is it a boon or a curse for the mankind?
The implication of medical technology is responsible for increasing human’s life expectancy, which is fairly debatable, has now gained further attention from numerous arenas. The sizeable influence of this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this trend. I oppose the view and my reasons will be explained in the following paragraphs.
At the outset, there are diverse reasons why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one steams from the facts that due to the high level of medical technology the old age people’s population increased. Another reason is unemployment among the young generation because old peoples do the jobs.
Moreover the death rate decreased and birth rate also increased due to the medical technology. Old peoples get the medical treatment and doctors save their lives with the help of high level of technology. Likewise governments give the pensions and other facilities to the old peoples beside these facilities old peoples do the work in offices and in other fields and the youth face the unemployment problem.
The importance of Medical technology is responsible for an increase in human’s life expectancy can be debuted, but the fact remains that there were several factors that lead to this theme and matter. Eventually according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that government should take the benefit steps related to this issue and give the equal rights to everyone it can be predicted that in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 2, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...n because old peoples do the jobs. Moreover the death rate decreased and birth rate...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Likewise,
...h the help of high level of technology. Likewise governments give the pensions and other...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n be predicted that in the near future.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, moreover, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1286.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29218106996 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86717597373 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588477366255 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8141707675 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.6 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 7.25397266985 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246977642041 0.242375264174 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096549928698 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148584903842 0.071462118173 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145561796214 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0923212614692 0.0609392437508 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.