Some people think that keeping pets is a good for children while others thinks it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? discuss both opinion give example
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s life with a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that people think that keeping pets is a good for children while others thinks it is dangerous and unhealthy. There is widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that that people think that keeping pets is a good for children while others thinks it is dangerous and unhealthy can not only contribute to keeping all type of pets which is dangerous which is dangerous for children, but only can one numerous benefits more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence in concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned proposition is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverance. Hence, it apparent why many are favor of that people think that keeping pets is a good for children while others thinks it is dangerous and unhealthy.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of that people think that keeping pets is a good for children while others thinks it is dangerous and unhealthy are indeed to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e in the number of people believing that people think that keeping pets is a good...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 5.94088669951 269% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89198606272 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7462724127 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.452961672474 0.580463131201 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 440.1 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.430464218 50.4703680194 203% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 140.4 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.7 20.9669160288 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374518102297 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15489715098 0.0925447433944 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18196031644 0.071462118173 255% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271090952959 0.151781067708 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436746336854 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 53.1260098522 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.