Migration to cities are increasing and public transport must be developed.
Recently, the phenomenon of migration to cities and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of convenient public transport system is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that increasing the comprehensive transport systems can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, developing the public transport can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of a wide variety of transport systems, as well as being affordable, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of constructing more subways on increasing the migration to the city. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both the influx of immigrants and overcrowding apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of traffic science, increasing the migration might increase the consequences of the crowded city. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the busy street could relate to this reality that the demerits of lack of public transport pertain to over population. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of constructing more vehicle is correlated negatively with the migration to cities. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of an affordable transport system.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of developing the transport network far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of the convenient transport system prove the significance of being easy to access, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61805555556 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24069775104 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600694444444 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4663623586 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.833333333 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321357320182 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100440018899 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.043944861419 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181982799518 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492066641433 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.47 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.