Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the phenomenon of doing the same thing in life and the corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of avoiding the repetitive lifestyle is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being a creature of new habits can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, avoiding changes can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of having a sustainable circumstance, as well as permanent relationship are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment, which discovered the influence of the sedentary lifestyle on losing the self-confidence. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the repetitive habits and lack of social relationship apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, changing habits as a good thing might increase the consequences of routine lifestyle. Moreover, the fundamental aspect of trying new experience could relate to this reality that the demerit of create a diverse situations is pertain to new relationship. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of unchanged life is correlated with introvert people. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of lack of experience.
To conclude, while there are several compelling argument in both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of changing lifestyle far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of getting familiar with constructive habits prove the significance of promoting self-esteem, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-05 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-16 | viviana | 65 | view |
| 2018-10-08 | Alka | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-29 | Manisha Verma | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-25 | azzitta | 85 | view |
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? . 78
- The government should reduce their investment in arts, music, and painting. Agree or disagree? 11
- Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion? 77
- Some people think digital ... make them lazier while some people think it gives them more knowledge what's your idea? 88
- If you want to study a particular area of climate change, which area/subject will you choose? . 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 240, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'situation'?
Suggestion: situation
...ty that the demerit of create a diverse situations is pertain to new relationship. As a ta...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'pertained'.
Suggestion: pertained
...merit of create a diverse situations is pertain to new relationship. As a tangible exam...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57597173145 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32702354098 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618374558304 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9737484466 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129017851458 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0433721039378 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434929238208 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.071200222255 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151677357703 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.52 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.