Space exploration is the concept of finding the useful information about space such as availability of minerals, water and more. There has been a tremendous development in this field over past years by various countries, but some countries refute to invest on space exploration rather to spend that on feeding the people on Earth who are suffering from hunger. This essay will discuss the points relates to both and reach to a logical conclusion to spend for space or hunger.
To start with, the space research involves a large amount of money to be spend on their experiments, but which may or not give the fruitful results. If we get the useful results from the research then it will be considered as a great achievement. For instance, recently a space research company Tesla has found the possibility of humans to live on the moon and crafting space vehicles to take normal people to moon in near future.
On the other side, some countries believes that space exploration will help the people for future, but to see the future people must live today, so they want to spend on feeding the people who are suffering from hunger. For illustration, recently a survey conducted by World Health Organization found that around 40% of the people on the earth are not having food at least 2 times a day, so it suggested the countries to spend more on feeding the people.
To put it in a nutshell, spending on space research will cost a lot of money and efforts, but to feed the people it needs very less amount of money and efforts comparing to that, so I believe it’s better to spend on feeding the people first than on space.
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year SOme people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth Do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? !f voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 61
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. SOme people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 262, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...feeding the people first than on space.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, at least, for instance, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 31.9359605911 160% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1349.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 288.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68402777778 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56222474809 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524305555556 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.5024630542 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.1901533485 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.888888889 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.0 20.9669160288 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.55555555556 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196015661409 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874411634087 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0367700582227 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128529250045 0.151781067708 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232070065371 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.92 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 11.5310837438 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.3980295567 142% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.