An organization is because of its employees. Employees and management are the pillars of organization, higher authorities should include the employees’ suggestions or ideas for organization growth that motivates the employees to work productively.
Higher management need to take the inputs from employees whenever is needed, this has various advantages for organization as well as for employees, this will make the employees to feel included in the decision and develops positive attitude towards the organization. In my current organization higher management take the suggestions from employees in decision making for organizational activities such as extracurricular, cultural and social programs. Sometimes including the employees in organizational activities will help the organization to save money else they may need to consult some services for that decision making.
If higher management don’t include the employees’ suggestions then employees may feel like they are avoided in the organization and it may affect the productivity. In one of my friends’ organization the management has never included them in any decisions and organizational activities, so their productivity has dramatically went down in the recent times it led to huge losses for the organization.
In my opinion the building blocks of organization are its employees so the management should take their suggestions or ideas, and will definitely help in growth of organization and its employees.
- Company Top level Authorities should or should not take employees suggestions or ideas to take any decisions. Discuss. 55
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year SOme people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth Do you agree or disagree 89
- In some countries around the world, voting is compulsory. Do you agree with the notion of compulsory voting? !f voting is compulsory in a democratic society, what are some conclusions we can draw about the nature of democracy? 61
- Millions of dollars are spent on space research every year. SOme people argue the money should be spent on improving living standards on Earth. Do you agree or disagree? 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, so, then, well, as for, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 218.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89449541284 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.60473706143 2.71678728327 133% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 139.433497537 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.48623853211 0.580463131201 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 405.0 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.4724277624 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 160.625 104.977214359 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 7.25397266985 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188332640252 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0961968474054 0.0925447433944 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794483472634 0.071462118173 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140858702636 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573645824432 0.0609392437508 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.9 12.6369458128 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 18.69 53.1260098522 35% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 6.54236453202 223% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.4 10.9458128079 159% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 11.5310837438 149% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.94827586207 171% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.