Mobile phones have an important role in people's lives. What are the pros and cons of using smartphones?

Essay topics:

Mobile phones have an important role in people's lives. What are the pros and cons of using smartphones?

In today’s world, Smart-phones play a significant role in our lives. The various apps available on Smart phones are indeed the key factor for reducing our intelligence levels. This essay will discuss the merits and demerits of Smart-phones and how it is affecting human intelligence.

First of all, all information can be stored in the smart -phones. This makes it incredibly easier for an Individual to make notes of important dates, key passwords and things to do. Consequently, we seldom use our memory to memorize important tasks. For instance, birthdays, key meeting notes, etc can be saved and pop up messages can be triggered on due dates. This could lead to loss of memory due to excessive dependence on Smart- phones.

Secondly, Smart-phones are embedded with spelling dictionary. Though, this enables, easy typing of messages, this could weaken the vocabulary of young students. As a result, too much dependence on such smart- phones would deter their intelligence. Additionally, Smart-phones also have in built calculator and excessive usage of such device would eventually reduce the mathematical and logical reasoning of individuals. For instance, College students may use Calculators for completion of their thesis and assignments but may suffer drastically in an exam environment.

This essay discussed various features of smart-phones and how it could affect our intelligence. In my opinion, thought Smart- phones are indeed great device to store loads of information, it is slowly decreasing our intelligence due to excessive usage.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, may, second, secondly, so, for instance, as a result, first of all, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 5.94088669951 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48962655602 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15003628601 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605809128631 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5676048995 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.2 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0666666667 20.9669160288 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123442528734 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463494985179 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392924722725 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0774207868435 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0248717908449 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.