More and more businesses as well as individuals are choosing to communicate either professionally or socially using technology rather than being face to face Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using technology for communicating

It is an irrefutable fact that the mode of communication has changed enormously with the advent of the internet. People prefer to use different technologies while communicating instead of having a face to face conversation. This essay will explain the positive and negative aspects of online communication.

One of the most important advantages of using technology is that it helps to cross the geographical barrier. For instance, a person sitting in India can contact his European clients instantly using email or Skype. This can be beneficial for the expansion of his business as he can interact with people from all over the world. Moreover, this way of interaction helps to reduce a lot of overheads like travel expenses and the cost incurred for setting up a meeting destination.

On the flip side, excessive dependence on communication technologies has its own disadvantages. To begin with, people lose the personal connect / connection when they refrain from face to face communication. This can make them feel lonely and depressed as they are devoid of social life and it can have a detrimental effect on their mental health. Furthermore, chances of fraud increase when we converse via phone or email, as we cannot verify the physical identity of the person we are interacting / conversing with.

To conclude, though technology has made communication easier and more convenient, there are numerous disadvantages as well if it is used excessively. So the mode of communication should be chosen judiciously taking into account several factors such as distance and time

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, while, for instance, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1330.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27777777778 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1703157732 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650793650794 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5713696559 50.4703680194 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.307692308 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302055782373 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101002851297 0.0925447433944 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100665997061 0.071462118173 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.178412266835 0.151781067708 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0660962228184 0.0609392437508 108% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.