More information available online so library books are useless.agree or disagree with statement?

Essay topics:

More information available online so library books are useless.agree or disagree with statement?

Recently, the phenomenon of online information and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of E-books is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that internet sites can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, available data can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of saving trees , as well as saving money, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the efficiency of online books. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both economy and invironment improvment apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of science, physical books might increase the consequences of cutting tree. Moreover, fundamental aspects of air-pollution would relate to this reality that the demerits of keeping book save pertain to building librarys. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of lack of library is correlated negatively with cultural center. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of communicate to each other.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of online search far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of vitual communication prove the significance of economy saving , but also pinpoint long-term implications.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-29 MehdiKhodadadi 85 view
2020-01-29 MehdiKhodadadi 85 view
2020-01-26 Alireza.r.68 85 view
2019-12-20 yasamin.gharib62 80 view
2019-11-11 English time 77 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...the fact that the merits of saving trees , as well as saving money, are inextricab...
^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hin the realm of science, physical books might increase the consequences of cutti...
^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y that the demerits of keeping book save pertain to building librarys. As an exam...
^^
Line 7, column 249, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...prove the significance of economy saving , but also pinpoint long-term implication...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1409.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59126984127 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19783207068 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686507936508 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9790695281 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.416666667 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123039783275 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035856834575 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0306068386482 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0628982953333 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224302219493 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.88 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.