"More information available online so library books are useless." Agree or disagree with statement?
Recently, electronic book has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "are library books useless?". Whereas it is a widely held view that E-books are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the information technology standpoint, electronic resources are bound up inextricably with internet, which indicates they lead to both easy access and broadband connection. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between unprintable books and E-reader as well as an exponential increase in public attention. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of hard covered books is correlated positively with not only saving forest but also low cost.
Within the realm of public perspective, without the slightest doubt, traditional book shop attribute to students, in that it would come down to library books, old-books, and learning environment. A salient example of such attribution is online articles, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take social networks for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint lack in natural resources problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to reading, paper, and even children. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of internet access.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the advantages of library books are of more significance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-20 | yasamin.gharib62 | 80 | view |
- Some people think past history has nothing or little to tell us, but others think that studying the past history can help us better understand the present. Please discuss the two views and give your own opinion 85
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical knowledge but give more practical training throughout their courses. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- You are given climate as the field of study. Which area will you prefer? Explain why you picked up the particular area for your study? 85
- Has polygamy increased widely in this modern and brutal life? How far do you agree with this statement? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the information technology standpoi...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y saving forest but also low cost. Within the realm of public perspective, ...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e pivotal role of internet access. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78623188406 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14406544987 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.699275362319 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3808312199 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.846153846 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2307692308 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128992889478 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0359681026647 0.0925447433944 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0332072443754 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0738982094544 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0258933343681 0.0609392437508 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.