Most artists earn low salaries and should, therefore, receive social welfare from governments in order for them to continue their work. Discuss the extent to which you would agree/disagree with this statement. Support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and examples.
Nowadays, governments give social welfare to artists, which has attracted many controversies and drawn attention from the public. It is agreed that these artists do not have such high income, while on the other hand, should be supported in this way. In my opinion, governments should support these low earning artists. This essay will elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are various reasons why artists should receive funds from governments and the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that they do not earn enough for their livelihood. As an illustration, most of them are hardworking but still are not able to support their families. By this way, government funding offers little support to ease their distress.
Nevertheless, there are some downsides, which can certainly overwhelm the effect of social welfare by the government, and the most alarming one roots from the fact that most of these individuals misuse the funds. For instance, these individuals resort to drugs and drinking when they get money without doing anything. Moreover, they become unproductive and lazy. Hence, this merits the case that free social welfare makes them useless and adversely affect their families.
In the light of above discussion, it is concluded that governments should help the low earners by providing social welfare, however, this welfare would be more appropriate if they will be in kind and not cash.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-05 | jyotikumari042 | 70 | view |
| 2018-02-12 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-02-12 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-02-12 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
| 2018-01-16 | kamranakhtar20@hotmail.com | 77 | view |
- “The illiterates of the 21st century are not those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn”- Alvin Toffler. Explain the statement and do you agree or not? 77
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss the positive and negative impacts of this. 77
- Some people believe that law changes human behaviour. Do you agree with it? 70
- The mass media including TV, radio, newspaper influence our society and shape our opinions and characters. What is your opinion? 77
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic ? Support your opinion with examples. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, thus, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19491525424 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67432975599 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610169491525 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 362.7 379.143842365 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1316499106 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.166666667 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.91666666667 7.25397266985 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321756117404 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109444718404 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0617460867937 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186181710437 0.151781067708 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0547226956025 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.