In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not? Give your reasons.
Recently, the phenomenon of written examination assessment in the educational system and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of written examination is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that, continual assessment on a yearly basis can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, the written examination can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that being self-disciplined as well as getting an equal opportunity in a specific amount of time for assessment. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I perform an academic experiment which discovered written assessment caused students become competitive and more hardworking. Thus the beneficial consequences of both self-disciplined and equality can be observed.
Within the realm of assessments, writing examination might exacerbate the consequences of the education system. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of writing examination related to this reality that the demerit of appraisal of pupils pertains to the pressure of examination and feeling of disappointment. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted the downside of the written exams correlated negatively with a sense of anxiety and cheating on the test. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of traditional assessment.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of modern assessment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of this kind of appraisal prove the significance of widely used around the world, but also reduce written assessments implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | njerime | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 22 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | armimogh | 85 | view |
| 2019-01-25 | armimogh | 85 | view |
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc. and whether you support them or not. 11
- Parents are responsible for the behavior of the children. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 85
- variety of qualified workers from the year 1995 to 2020 61
- Do you support dangerous activities like extreme skiing? what are the reasons for that? 77
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons impacts. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ecome competitive and more hardworking. Thus the beneficial consequences of both sel...
^^^^
Line 5, column 507, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...se of anxiety and cheating on the test. Hence it is correct to presume the preconceiv...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74295774648 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43467641604 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612676056338 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0077395381 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.916666667 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132143874549 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448944296613 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396258669672 0.071462118173 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765142945734 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.026099514086 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 22.75 53.1260098522 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.