In most of the education systems, students are assessed by written examinations. Do you think it is a good idea or not?
Today, with development of psychology and human science, the matter of proper educational assessment has been drawn eyes on it. Some said assessing through examination is the only choice we have right now. On the other hand, scientists, especially psychologists, said this method of assessing is destructive. This essay will discuss how assessing pupils by examining through writing or formal examination can highly have a negative effect on student’s mind.
The phenomena of assessing students’ ability can be found in the realm of psychology, where scientists recently discovered that negative effect of having stress for examination could have a tremendous effect on right hemisphere of one’s brain. Consider a student who has been studied hard through a semester and at the very end of his term, he/she will face with a harsh situation like losing a close relative. The conventional education system have no option for such situation, he/she should take his /her exam, and this way of assessing can have a negative imprint on his/her mind. Actually, people should believe that this way of assessing belongs to years ago that discoveries about human science was at its beginning.
Nonetheless, Teacher and pragmatists firmly believe that grading students by their exams is the only suitable way for assessing them fairly. In this notion, they believe that this kind of assessing is the only proper way to make them ready for every unfair situation. They think, for example, team working can help them to make instant decision in not-predicted situation but this kind of upbringing is just see one aspect of one’s ability and the other abilities may not clearly be distinct. Yet, they don’t know that these day the only thing that matters is team working, making proper decision and making student ready to be a great leader, creative dreamer, or successful manager.
As far as people can remember, has there been always reciprocal challenge between psychologists and traditional decision makers on an optimum method to assess students. I, as a former student, strongly believe that assessing students with this current method can be clearly harmful for students’ brain and will stop them for being creative.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-22 | njerime | 77 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 22 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | kooshandehfar | 11 | view |
| 2019-05-23 | ddk0014 | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-28 | foadihasan | 77 | view |
- Some people think genetically modified GM crops are a positive development Others however argue that they are potentially dangerous Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The mass media, including television, radio and newspapers, have great influence in shaping people's ideas. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience 77
- Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 529, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this day' or 'these days'?
Suggestion: this day; these days
...istinct. Yet, they don't know that these day the only thing that matters is team wor...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, may, nonetheless, so, for example, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 20.9802955665 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1207.87684729 156% => OK
No of words: 356.0 242.827586207 147% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30898876404 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 3.92707691288 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85648054888 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 139.433497537 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564606741573 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 379.143842365 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.2325059204 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.42857142857 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1279164676 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525864126484 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243258691802 0.071462118173 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897537659559 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193641092925 0.0609392437508 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.