Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem to have less free time. In your opinion, has technology improved the quality of life or made it more complicated?
Nowadays, many people started using more gadgets in their daily life for various purposes, this attracted numerous controversies and drawn the people's attention. It can be agreed that the gadgets easies the tasks of people, while on the hand stands a perspective that it increases the laziness of people. This essay will elaborate on both the sides and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons to say that the gadgets will improve the quality of life and the most conspicuous one is the gadgets will save time of the people. As an illustration, the dish washer and washing machine are automated and doesnt require manual intervention to complete their job, this helps to spend their time in other activities. In addition, these gadgets saves the energy of people. Thus, the usage of gadgets has become part of our life.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks and the most predominant one is that the gadgets create more dependancy on it for people. For instance, if the washing machine is not working for a day the people will not look for an alternative to wash their clothes by hand. Therefore, these machines have made people sluggish to do their tasks.
In light of the discussion above, it can be concluded that usage of gadgets has improved the life style of people and its impact is prominent. still, the people should use their free time due to the gadgets usage should be planned and used appropriately.
- Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem t 72
- More and more students are studying at universities abroad, either because it is cheaper, or because they feel they can receive a better education, or because it will provide them with greater professional opportunities. Which one do you think is the most 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ed numerous controversies and drawn the peoples attention. It can be agreed that the ga...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hus will lead to a logical conclusion. At the outset, there are myriad of reaso...
^^^
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...r and washing machine are automated and doesnt require manual intervention to complete...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at the gadgets create more dependancy on it for people. For instance, if the wash...
^^
Line 7, column 144, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Still
... of people and its impact is prominent. still, the people should use their free time ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'gadgets'' or 'gadget's'?
Suggestion: gadgets'; gadget's
...e should use their free time due to the gadgets usage should be planned and used approp...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1219.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.876 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60277083125 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8903641082 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.583333333 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142873216055 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0626132145675 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463158526433 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0902511327624 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.01488398652 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 12.6369458128 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.