Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem t

In this day and age, having homes with labor-saving devices and gadgets created by last technologies are the sign of developed nations. Although these appliances regarded as thoroughly constructive and positive to human's life by the public around the world, there are many people claim that these technologies made it more complicated. For the purpose of this essay, I will analyze this statement.
To begin with, there are various reasons to support that living in homes with advanced devices has more free time and convenient. At first, one of the disadvantages of living in modern houses is less exercise, the cause of many diseases. However, these houses made more free time for us. For example, the home works have done faster than before the advent of recent appliances such as vacuum cleaner and dishwasher.
In addition, depending on these gadgets has negative effects on people's living. But, they made our life simplest and more convenience. People can do their works themselves in homes full of computer devices. For instance, a recent research conducted by MTR University researchers in 2016 has shown that a significant number of computer appliances in modern houses play the role of one servant and people no need to employ any person to service to them.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on this statement, I profoundly believe that the benefits of this computer devices are far outweighed their drawbacks.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 453, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o employ any person to service to them. In conclusion, while there are several c...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1220.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 235.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1914893617 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91531732006 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75973112631 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 386.1 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4845334707 50.4703680194 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5833333333 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.41666666667 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202572594282 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708189881522 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0741417182234 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105619989936 0.151781067708 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664002883643 0.0609392437508 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.