Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons or individual countries. In other words, it is an international problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of environmental issues has sparked an ongoing controversy, which leads to a moot question, whose responsibility is to maintain environment? Where it is held view that every single individual contribution is essential, however many believe in contrary. In this essay both sides of argument will be discussed and lead towards a plausible conclusion.
From social standpoint, each individual good habits can provide society with some noticeable effect which are rooted in the fact that waste pollution and sole contribution are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that environment issues such as water pollution, air pollution and many other serious threats can be minimized, if government and organization put up strict policies to deal with hurdles.
Within the realm of globalization, the problems arise from within the community and move globally, which cannot be solved internationally. Smaller issue like smoking, plastic waste to bigger issue such as deforestation, urbanization, industries and automobiles emission of gases etc plays a vital role in increasing environmental issue. It can be observed that personal contribution from smaller level can have greater effect internationally. Moreover, fundamental aspect of global issue can display an overall picture, which leads to this notion that these issue vary from nation to nation. As a tangible example, a research conducted by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of international solution correlates negatively. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of environmental statistics.
To conclude there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the change should happen at an personal level but government, corporates must work together to fight this by fostering organic lifestyle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-20 | Junaid54 | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | Sidra018 | 85 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | jasman singh | 61 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | jasman singh | 61 | view |
- What are the advantages and disadvantages of new technologies? Support your view with real life example 85
- Restricting air travel is the only way to prevent air pollution Do you agree 73
- Some say that music is as important as other subjects in schools to promote learning in children life. Do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 80
- The only effective way to deal with unemployment is to introduce rapid urbanization. How far you agree? 11
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 253, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun hold seems to be countable; consider using: 'many holds'.
Suggestion: many holds
...dual contribution is essential, however many hold a contrary view. In this essay both sid...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p strict policies to deal with hurdles. Within the realm of globalization, the p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Plays
... and automobiles emission of gases etc. plays a vital role in increasing environmenta...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...elieve that the change should happen at an personal level but government, corporat...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75778546713 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30543474837 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660899653979 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 379.143842365 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7818953741 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.53846153846 7.25397266985 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127837017825 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412294591326 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0182573573698 0.071462118173 26% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0688031912932 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0181588960853 0.0609392437508 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.46 8.32886699507 126% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 55.0591133005 191% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.