Nowadays, people spend too much time at work the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss or not discuss?
Recently, the phenomenon of people spend and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that they hardly can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, personal life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, at work might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of have time for their personal life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
- Any new technological development in the recent years is a boon or curse for the society in general 88
- Whether design of building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work? 77
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss or not discuss? 88
- More information available online so library books are useless. Agree or disagree with statement? 88
- Governments promise continuous economic growths, but it’s actually an illusion. Some people think that governments should abandon this. Please talk about the validity and the implications. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. From a general standpoint, personal lif...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... essay. From a general standpoint, personal life can provide the society wi...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... notion of this remarkable phenomenon. To conclude, while there are several com...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69620253165 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2343912062 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.696202531646 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0723501201 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.727272727 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5454545455 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136252991469 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438071427565 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606898810621 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0733887438373 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451969497335 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 12.6369458128 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.87 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.