Some students work while studying. This often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure. What do you think are the causes of this? What solution can you suggest?
Recently, the phenomenon of students work while studying and this often results in lacking time for education and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that constantly feeling under pressure can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, think part time work for students helping to time for education can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and accordingly complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, this often results in lacking time for education and constantly feeling under pressure might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of this often results for some students work while studying, feeling under pressure far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues’ potential implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | yasamin.gharib62 | 85 | view |
| 2019-06-18 | Nasir-RZN | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-03 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-03-03 | javanbakhttt@yahoo.com | 88 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | arami | 80 | view |
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- What is your opinion on deducting marks on student's work if it is late? 85
- People emphasizing goverment to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicle the are overcrowding the cities. Do you agree or disagree? 88
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
- Nowadays, people spend too much time at work the extent that they hardly have time for their personal life. Discuss or not discuss? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ll analyze that throughout this essay. From a general standpoint, think part ti...
^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...y. From a general standpoint, think part time work for students helping to time for e...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1574.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70289855072 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12423063413 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.7909370657 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.090909091 104.977214359 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0909090909 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376517975217 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129932707535 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104705436951 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225518391725 0.151781067708 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034313341816 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.0 12.6369458128 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.