Ireeefutably in this contemporary scenario, it is a common phenomenon in the human being lives in existing time. However, in this ways alter in masses talking with others in day to day lives. It has a double-edged award and this essay would shed light on the pors and cons analysis of development in this upcoming paragraphs.
Commencing with the most salient benefits can be drawn for the masses. The original point to be considered is that majority of individual influence by new technology. Although the trend of mobile phones and computer has altered interaction with each other, we can not neglect the fruitful impact of this trend. For example, nowadays, it is shown that a lot of individuals do work at home on this equipment and they are not needed for outside.
Nevertheless, there are also innumerable demerits, which cannot be ignored. The provoking factor behind it is that owing to technology equipment individual distract from talking with surrounding people compare to past time. It is fact that despite young population more uses it, due to adverse bad effect on health and eye connect. In addition to, despite the reduction of friendship bond between people. Ergo, it can be dangerous for their future.
To conclude, I pen down saying that this essay tends to iterate that although people enhance vast part and parcel knowledge from the technology, we can not neglect of awful effect for the younger generation lives.
- The chart below show the percentage of whole world population in four countries from 1950 to 2000 will projection till 2050
- The bar chart shows the percentage of the total world population in four countries in 1950 and 2002 and projections for 2050 73
- The table shows the proportion of income spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 78
- Governments in many countries have recently introduced special taxes on foods and beverages with high levels of sugar Some think these taxes are a good idea while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- The graphs below show the percentage of household energy used and the amount of greenhouse gases produced in Australia Summarise the information making comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 126, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ing lives in existing time. However, in this ways alter in masses talking with other...
^^^^
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...king with surrounding people compare to past time. It is fact that despite young populati...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, nevertheless, so, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04184100418 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75952762891 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627615062762 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0095627182 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.6923076923 104.977214359 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.38461538462 7.25397266985 60% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159313218644 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470090342191 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523069537122 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0870813530001 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315203294129 0.0609392437508 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 59.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.