One way to solve the problem of congestion in cities is to build sky trains which run overhead rather than on or under the ground What are the advantages and disadvantages of using this solution to solve congestion

The obstacle of traffic in cities can be solved by building sky trains running overhead instead of under or on the ground. Although air trains are more convenient, environment friendly, their are also some drawbacks to be taken into account.

On the one hand, the main benefit of sky train is as it is running overhead, easy to access and fast mode or transportation. According to a recent survey done by Stanford University more than sixty percent of people prefer this mode of transportation. Secondly, because it moves on overhead rather than on the ground without any fuel, it therefore assist to reduce congestion and pollution. As a result, using this sort of transport highly beneficical for tackling congestion in big cities.

On the other hand, there are a plethora of demerits of air plane mode for travel. The main disadvantage is not to access all desired locations according to individual choice. People need to book their tickets and reach their destination after reaching the specific platform by the department. Another issue is that it is not cost-effective. Even though air train is easy to access but need to pay a huge amount for ticket.

In conclusion, the nodoubt sky train is one of the best ways to handle traffic in cities and there are ample advantages of this but some demerits paying a large amount and not having access to all locations nobody can neglect.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 187, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... more convenient, environment friendly, their are also some drawbacks to be taken int...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assists'?
Suggestion: assists
...e ground without any fuel, it therefore assist to reduce congestion and pollution. As ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 198, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'locations'' or 'location's'?
Suggestion: locations'; location's
...rge amount and not having access to all locations nobody can neglect.
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion, sort of, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91101694915 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79101584782 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559322033898 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6615830232 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5833333333 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301794123335 0.242375264174 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913093502392 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100190558 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16456954871 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088113140519 0.0609392437508 145% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.