Online materials like music, movies, etc. are accessible at no cost. Do you think online material should be accessed at no cost?
In this era of technology, almost everything such as music,movies,news is available online. Some people believe that there should be a cost for accessibility to these materials while some argue that it should be free. This essay will discuss how making access to online material will be beneficial.
To begin with, free material will help a poor person to have access to learning. In this world many are unable to go to school or get even basic education because of financial issues. For example, according to a survey conducted by Higher Education of Pakistan, almost 50 percent of children did not go to school in last 10 years because of financial constraints of their parents. Therefore, with free material available online, it will help in improving the literacy rate of a nation.
Secondly, easy access to material online will help in use time of efficiently. In cases where deep understanding of a topic is required some people prefer to go to a library which consumes their time. For instance, I used to go to British council library, which was very far from my home, when I was in school for some of my assignments as internet was not common in those days and it would take almost a week to finish an assignment. Thus, with easy access to material online will improve the efficiency.
To conclude, access to online material is beneficial for poor people as well as it improves efficiency of a person. In my opinion, access to online material should be free of cost.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 59, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , movies
...hnology, almost everything such as music,movies,news is available online. Some people b...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1228.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.796875 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7866871012 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546875 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 398.7 379.143842365 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.65517241379 246% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9039966956 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4615384615 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.25397266985 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277400400752 0.242375264174 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1294653193 0.0925447433944 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122354205712 0.071462118173 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214681461819 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125721662424 0.0609392437508 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 12.6369458128 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.