Organisations involve employees in decision making process of their products and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both.
In this modern era, the phenomenon of involving employees in the decision-making process and its corresponding impacts, has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that delegation of power is highly beneficial for companies, such a critical decision regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of experts in an array of fields. I am inclined to believe that employees’ participation can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a psychological standpoint, engaging employees in the decision making process provide the society with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that both organizations’ hierarchy, as well as employees’ morale, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered employees are a source of information. Thus, beneficial ramifications of regular feedbacks apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of organizational behavior, the participation of employees in the decision-making process might increase the consequences of providing different viewpoints. Moreover, fundamental aspects of leading a team related to this reality that the demerits of to rising conflicts pertain to final outputs. A recent scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of voicing an opinion is correlated negatively with achieving success in business. Hence, it is logical to assume the preconceived notion of seeking opinions.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of any organizational chart far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of empowering workforce to prove the significance of leadership, but also pinpoint meticulous planning implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-28 | gupta-vikas | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-05 | sunilkms | 77 | view |
| 2018-05-03 | chandutammisetti | 77 | view |
| 2018-02-23 | Rana Montazeri | 88 | view |
| 2017-11-28 | Amir NIkzad | 77 | view |
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 85
- Organisations involve employees in decision making process of their products and services. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both. 88
- Do you think the significance of English language as an interna5onal languagewill be lost with globaliza5on or its significance will increase with globaliza5on?What is your opinion? 77
- Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with details from your own 80
- In underdeveloped countries, tourism has disadvantages and can be said the opposite as well. Discuss your opinions and give examples. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 204, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...hat both organizations' hierarchy, as well as employees' morale, are inextricabl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1607.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.86496350365 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.61476959432 2.71678728327 133% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649635036496 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4297660245 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.916666667 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8333333333 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218080027479 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648513667011 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749361487488 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115165129328 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0481328054876 0.0609392437508 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.18 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 55.0591133005 203% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.