The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A huge amount of cars and vehicles has become a rampant topic among environmental experts because it has created numerous problems such as traffic congestion and pollution. Some people suggest that the authority should be more restricted to the car's ownership by allowing only one vehicle per family. While some agree with the solution, others seems to disobey it due to various reasons. As far as I am concerned, the positive effects of this new legistration completely outweigh the negative ones.

To begin with, world pollution is caused by many underlying issues, though the main cause is believed to be the abundance of today vehicles. As we know, there are approximately one millions cars have been manufactured every year and this leads to an ultimate congestion in the near future. Furthermore, it is undoubtedly that the more cars will produce more carbon footprint which severely damages to our already vulnerable environment. Hence, the restriction of allowing only one car per family is proven to be beneficial in the long run.

Although, some are against with this policy because they have not experienced such a chaotic atmosphere during a peark hour of the traffic. Moreover, the disobedience of those members is potentially prone diffcult for government to control the car industry which may lead to other grim issues in the future.

In conclusion, despite many disagreements with the new restriction, one car per family policy seems to be a legitimate solution for the greater good of our environment because it not only impacts on our social well-being but also our future offsprings.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: A_HUNDREDS[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. Consider using: 'one million'
Suggestion: one million
...es. As we know, there are approximately one millions cars have been manufactured every year ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17624521073 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91091938264 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632183908046 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2209849512 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.818181818 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.45454545455 7.25397266985 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250059526651 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889423880101 0.0925447433944 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840306701204 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139497318506 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665271578396 0.0609392437508 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.