Undoubtedly, in these days, it is an irrefutable fact that one family owns few cars and many people argue that ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family. While it is possible to believe that it helps to reduce traffic congestion and environment pollution, but in my point of view, I disagree with the argument. In this essay, I shall explain both positive and negative impacts of owning more than one car per family.
At present, many people do not prefer to use public transport due to various reasons. One of them is that the inconsistencies of transport services and some would argue buses and trains always delays so they prefer to use their own method of transportation. With regards to a study conducted at Harvard University, it is revealed that family conflicts are minimized when a family uses few methods of transport. Apart from that, members of a family have different working schedules and it is nearly impossible to rely on one family car.
Secondly, there are few people argue that owning a more than one vehicle contributes to congestion and pollution. There are other concerns such as financial and family commitment and those made it harder to afford few cars for a one family. Then some say that public transport is cheaper and available both day and night.
While it is there are strong arguments to support both sides of the case, but in my opinion, I disagree with the argument of owning a one car per family and I strongly suggest people to use public transport where possible to reduce the traffic congestion and pollution.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e the traffic congestion and pollution.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, secondly, so, then, while, apart from, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1304.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82962962963 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6920092088 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525925925926 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2806996802 50.4703680194 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.545454545 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309239052047 0.242375264174 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.114071817156 0.0925447433944 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856977605762 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200385790096 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0967913487932 0.0609392437508 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.